Is that a shuttle in her hand?
Jun. 22nd, 2006 03:45 pmI was reading a biography of Lewis Carroll last week and this photo of his Aunt Lucy made me wonder... Could she be tatting? I thought I'd ask you as you've been so knowledgable in the past. Probably dating from the 1860s or so, and posed because at that time photography was a very cumbersome and complicated business, I'd love to think it was, but my "ami" thinks she's just darning a sock!


(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-22 02:54 pm (UTC)In addition to this, the lace around her hair is almost certainly tatted, and quite frequently during this time period a woman was photographed with something she was particularly well known for - her knitting, a sewing machine perhaps, or, in this case, a tatting shuttle.
You go, Aunt Lucy!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-22 03:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-22 03:28 pm (UTC)As to why your ami thinks she's darning a sock, also remind him that photography in the 1850s was horrendously expensive as well as being very inconvenient - those who could afford the process as well as the trip into town to the studio would have wanted to show themselves at their best. Darning was something done every day by men and women, rich and poor alike, but not all had the time or ability to tat.
I have seen period photographs with knitting or crocheting, though these art forms were considered "common" and thusly not often seen. It was more common to find a young woman with a bobbin-lace pillow, with a child sitting next to her knitting a sock. Or an older woman might be photographed with an intricately crocheted table cloth spread on a nearby table or over her lap.
Sewing machines, also, were convenient props at a photographer's studio. They were quite expensive at the time, and very heavy as well. A tailor might have one, and might have someone photograph him in his shop, but a woman would pose with the machine rather than at it. Often you will find them with the machine backwards - they'd never seen one, or if they had, certainly they'd not had much occasion to use one!
Most of the photographs I've seen of lace makers were Dutch or Belgique; you will find a lot of knotting, but little tatting, in British and Italian photography and portraiture. South American photography, when found, typically features crocheted items, and North American will have a lot of sewing machines, typically Willcox & Gibbs or Singer. When you can find them, African photography tends to feature white women (usually British) teaching hand-sewing or knitting to the natives, who may be sitting uncomfortably next to them, or more often crouching at their feet.
I realise, it's far more information than you ever wanted...apologies if it annoys!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-22 04:30 pm (UTC)I have to admit David was just being facetious, he felt I was making a bit of a fuss...he didn't really look at the photo.
I love your icon, I have always been puzzled as to how exactly sewing machines work!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-22 05:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-22 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-22 07:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-23 10:09 am (UTC)The bio was by Morton N. Cohen and was published in USA, and I think the photo belongs to him...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-24 05:32 am (UTC)Anyway, it's a very interesting picture!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-24 07:35 pm (UTC)My understanding is that a knotting shuttle is significantly bigger than a tatting shuttle. I'd imagine that would have been easier to identify in a picture like this one. *shrug* But I've never actually seen one myself, so.....
But, yes, it is very interesting! :D
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-25 03:28 pm (UTC)On Riego's book 2 there are illustrations of this method. You can have the whole book for download from Georgia Seitz site.
http://www.georgiaseitz.com/public/publicindex.html
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-26 12:22 am (UTC)